Index

Subject : [lug] Digest (3 messages)

From : lug-owner@lists.ncsu.[redacted]

Date : Fri, 22 Jul 2016 09:52:39 -0400


The Lug Digest
Volume 1 : Issue 377 : "text" Format

Messages in this Issue:
201606/11 : Re: Char has been upgraded
Antonious Iskander <amiskand@ncsu.[redacted]>
201606/12 : Re: Char has been upgraded
Quentin Young <qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]>
201606/13 : Re: Char has been upgraded
Antonious Iskander <amiskand@ncsu.[redacted]>

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:07:48 -0400
From: Antonious Iskander <amiskand@ncsu.[redacted]>
To: lug@lists.ncsu.[redacted]
Subject: Re: Char has been upgraded
Message-ID: <CAFAjCZOGZyoW1BX-Kd1EWTaXhK7b4pAEb-Lgh3ArWEYGw6Htdw@mail.gmail.[redacted]>

how about a vpn or an anonomous web proxy?

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:49 PM, Quentin Young <qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]> wrote:

> I am wrong, students retain IP over their code. However the FAQ does
> indeed note:
>
> *"NCSU GitHub is specifically designed to not compete with Github.com as
> far as public offering. “Public” inside of NCSU GitHub is public to the
> institution, not the world. If a given project is truly open source, then
> it may be more appropriate to host it at GitHub.com with a personal
> account."*
>
> ...or on your friendly neighborhood Linux User Group's hosted git service
> :-)
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:03 PM, Quentin Young <qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]> wrote:
>
>> Additionally, I may be wrong on this front, but I recall reading
>> somewhere that the University retains many privileges and some form of
>> copyright over any code hosted there. If anyone has further information on
>> this I'd love to know more, but that's my understanding.
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Quentin Young <qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]> wrote:
>>
>>> NCSU's GitHub Enterprise instance is fully private and requires LDAP
>>> authentication with your Unity credentials. Repositories are not
>>> world-readable. My vote is still with a hosted Git service.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Neill Robson <nlrobson@ncsu.[redacted]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ah, I had not thought of that! Well, a hosted git service was the only
>>>> idea I had, unfortunately.
>>>>
>>>> On 06/16/2016 08:31 AM, Antonious Iskander wrote:
>>>>
>>>> since ncsu has GitHub already then it would just be a redundant service
>>>> to have gitlab or gogs.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Brian Cottingham <
>>>> <spiffytech@gmail.[redacted]>spiffytech@gmail.[redacted]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> My previous employer tried very hard to use GitLab and had to switch
>>>>> to GitHub because GitLab's performance just wasn't there.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Todd Edwards < <todd@mtn.[redacted]>
>>>>> todd@mtn.[redacted]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Might I suggest something like Gogs (https://gogs.io/) instead of
>>>>>> Gitlab? In my experience the performance/hardware requirements of Gitlab in
>>>>>> comparison is night and day.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry, I just needed to get that out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- Todd
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Neill Robson < <nlrobson@ncsu.[redacted]>
>>>>>> nlrobson@ncsu.[redacted]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My vote is also still for a GitLab instance, since it leaves
>>>>>>> possibilities open for both personal and club-wide projects wherever
>>>>>>> programming is necessary (which is, of course, nearly everywhere).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My apologies for the radio silence on my end; I've been in China
>>>>>>> since the beginning of May and haven't had consistent access to email.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hope everybody's summer is going well!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 06/15/2016 08:15 AM, Quentin Young wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi again!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Looks like I made a typo in the last email; we upgraded *char*, not
>>>>>>> short, to Xenial.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Still haven't gotten any suggestions about what to use it for
>>>>>>> though! Let thy voice be heard!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yours,
>>>>>>> Quentin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 3:04 AM, Quentin Young < <qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]>
>>>>>>> qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm happy to announce that myself and our Vice President, Tony
>>>>>>>> Iskander,
>>>>>>>> successfully upgraded short to Ubuntu 16.04 (Xenial Xerus) on
>>>>>>>> Friday.
>>>>>>>> Installation went without a hitch, and you can expect some more
>>>>>>>> details on our
>>>>>>>> website soon.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As of now there are no user accounts (except for myself) because we
>>>>>>>> haven't yet
>>>>>>>> decided what to do with this particular piece of hardware.
>>>>>>>> Suggestions I have
>>>>>>>> heard so far are:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - seti@home
>>>>>>>> - folding@home
>>>>>>>> - others that I forgot
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would love to hear suggestions from members as to what we want to
>>>>>>>> use this
>>>>>>>> server for. Keep in mind it is an old server and its specs are not
>>>>>>>> quite as
>>>>>>>> beefy as Short:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - 2.8 GHz Intel Xeon, quadcore
>>>>>>>> - 3 GB memory (lol)
>>>>>>>> - 1 TB HDD
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My personal vote is for a GitLab instance. I've also been thinking
>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>> whether it might be prudent to simply move all of our hosted
>>>>>>>> services onto this
>>>>>>>> lower power server (currently those are the website and ZNC) and
>>>>>>>> keep short as
>>>>>>>> a higher performance server for use by club members. Anyway, reply
>>>>>>>> and let me
>>>>>>>> know what you think!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Enjoy the rest of your weekend,
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Quentin Young
>>>>>>>> President, LUG @ NC State
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Quentin Young
>>>>>>> President, LUG @ NC State
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Quentin Young
>>> President, LUG @ NC State
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Quentin Young
>> President, LUG @ NC State
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Quentin Young
> President, LUG @ NC State
>


[Attachment of type text/html removed.]

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:19:38 -0400
From: Quentin Young <qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]>
To: lug@lists.ncsu.[redacted]
Subject: Re: Char has been upgraded
Message-ID: <CANhSzx0EYLV3DH=eU89zaaNLkinAuVTS9kVLvqqXUO1T4MHhGg@mail.gmail.[redacted]>

I think if we hosted a VPN or anonymous web proxy on a University rack
terminating inside the University network the University would be very
upset with us. Not an option, I'm afraid.
On Jun 28, 2016 6:08 PM, "Antonious Iskander" <amiskand@ncsu.[redacted]> wrote:

> how about a vpn or an anonomous web proxy?
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:49 PM, Quentin Young <qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]> wrote:
>
>> I am wrong, students retain IP over their code. However the FAQ does
>> indeed note:
>>
>> *"NCSU GitHub is specifically designed to not compete with Github.com as
>> far as public offering. “Public” inside of NCSU GitHub is public to the
>> institution, not the world. If a given project is truly open source, then
>> it may be more appropriate to host it at GitHub.com with a personal
>> account."*
>>
>> ...or on your friendly neighborhood Linux User Group's hosted git service
>> :-)
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:03 PM, Quentin Young <qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]> wrote:
>>
>>> Additionally, I may be wrong on this front, but I recall reading
>>> somewhere that the University retains many privileges and some form of
>>> copyright over any code hosted there. If anyone has further information on
>>> this I'd love to know more, but that's my understanding.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Quentin Young <qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> NCSU's GitHub Enterprise instance is fully private and requires LDAP
>>>> authentication with your Unity credentials. Repositories are not
>>>> world-readable. My vote is still with a hosted Git service.
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Neill Robson <nlrobson@ncsu.[redacted]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ah, I had not thought of that! Well, a hosted git service was the only
>>>>> idea I had, unfortunately.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 06/16/2016 08:31 AM, Antonious Iskander wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> since ncsu has GitHub already then it would just be a redundant
>>>>> service to have gitlab or gogs.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Brian Cottingham <
>>>>> <spiffytech@gmail.[redacted]>spiffytech@gmail.[redacted]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> My previous employer tried very hard to use GitLab and had to switch
>>>>>> to GitHub because GitLab's performance just wasn't there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Todd Edwards < <todd@mtn.[redacted]>
>>>>>> todd@mtn.[redacted]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Might I suggest something like Gogs (https://gogs.io/) instead of
>>>>>>> Gitlab? In my experience the performance/hardware requirements of Gitlab in
>>>>>>> comparison is night and day.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry, I just needed to get that out.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- Todd
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Neill Robson < <nlrobson@ncsu.[redacted]>
>>>>>>> nlrobson@ncsu.[redacted]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My vote is also still for a GitLab instance, since it leaves
>>>>>>>> possibilities open for both personal and club-wide projects wherever
>>>>>>>> programming is necessary (which is, of course, nearly everywhere).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My apologies for the radio silence on my end; I've been in China
>>>>>>>> since the beginning of May and haven't had consistent access to email.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hope everybody's summer is going well!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 06/15/2016 08:15 AM, Quentin Young wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi again!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Looks like I made a typo in the last email; we upgraded *char*,
>>>>>>>> not short, to Xenial.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Still haven't gotten any suggestions about what to use it for
>>>>>>>> though! Let thy voice be heard!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yours,
>>>>>>>> Quentin
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 3:04 AM, Quentin Young < <qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]>
>>>>>>>> qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm happy to announce that myself and our Vice President, Tony
>>>>>>>>> Iskander,
>>>>>>>>> successfully upgraded short to Ubuntu 16.04 (Xenial Xerus) on
>>>>>>>>> Friday.
>>>>>>>>> Installation went without a hitch, and you can expect some more
>>>>>>>>> details on our
>>>>>>>>> website soon.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As of now there are no user accounts (except for myself) because
>>>>>>>>> we haven't yet
>>>>>>>>> decided what to do with this particular piece of hardware.
>>>>>>>>> Suggestions I have
>>>>>>>>> heard so far are:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - seti@home
>>>>>>>>> - folding@home
>>>>>>>>> - others that I forgot
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I would love to hear suggestions from members as to what we want
>>>>>>>>> to use this
>>>>>>>>> server for. Keep in mind it is an old server and its specs are not
>>>>>>>>> quite as
>>>>>>>>> beefy as Short:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - 2.8 GHz Intel Xeon, quadcore
>>>>>>>>> - 3 GB memory (lol)
>>>>>>>>> - 1 TB HDD
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> My personal vote is for a GitLab instance. I've also been thinking
>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>> whether it might be prudent to simply move all of our hosted
>>>>>>>>> services onto this
>>>>>>>>> lower power server (currently those are the website and ZNC) and
>>>>>>>>> keep short as
>>>>>>>>> a higher performance server for use by club members. Anyway, reply
>>>>>>>>> and let me
>>>>>>>>> know what you think!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Enjoy the rest of your weekend,
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Quentin Young
>>>>>>>>> President, LUG @ NC State
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Quentin Young
>>>>>>>> President, LUG @ NC State
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Quentin Young
>>>> President, LUG @ NC State
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Quentin Young
>>> President, LUG @ NC State
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Quentin Young
>> President, LUG @ NC State
>>
>
>


[Attachment of type text/html removed.]

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 06:13:14 -0400
From: Antonious Iskander <amiskand@ncsu.[redacted]>
To: lug@lists.ncsu.[redacted]
Subject: Re: Char has been upgraded
Message-ID: <CAFAjCZOP6qSkTZ_gjhysLBH4AgKKR4_n9C2J=7fUxemC-GsS+Q@mail.gmail.[redacted]>

what about web hosting? or private email addresses?

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Quentin Young <qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]> wrote:

> I think if we hosted a VPN or anonymous web proxy on a University rack
> terminating inside the University network the University would be very
> upset with us. Not an option, I'm afraid.
> On Jun 28, 2016 6:08 PM, "Antonious Iskander" <amiskand@ncsu.[redacted]> wrote:
>
>> how about a vpn or an anonomous web proxy?
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:49 PM, Quentin Young <qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]> wrote:
>>
>>> I am wrong, students retain IP over their code. However the FAQ does
>>> indeed note:
>>>
>>> *"NCSU GitHub is specifically designed to not compete with Github.com as
>>> far as public offering. “Public” inside of NCSU GitHub is public to the
>>> institution, not the world. If a given project is truly open source, then
>>> it may be more appropriate to host it at GitHub.com with a personal
>>> account."*
>>>
>>> ...or on your friendly neighborhood Linux User Group's hosted git
>>> service :-)
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:03 PM, Quentin Young <qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Additionally, I may be wrong on this front, but I recall reading
>>>> somewhere that the University retains many privileges and some form of
>>>> copyright over any code hosted there. If anyone has further information on
>>>> this I'd love to know more, but that's my understanding.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Quentin Young <qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> NCSU's GitHub Enterprise instance is fully private and requires LDAP
>>>>> authentication with your Unity credentials. Repositories are not
>>>>> world-readable. My vote is still with a hosted Git service.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Neill Robson <nlrobson@ncsu.[redacted]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ah, I had not thought of that! Well, a hosted git service was the
>>>>>> only idea I had, unfortunately.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 06/16/2016 08:31 AM, Antonious Iskander wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> since ncsu has GitHub already then it would just be a redundant
>>>>>> service to have gitlab or gogs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Brian Cottingham <
>>>>>> <spiffytech@gmail.[redacted]>spiffytech@gmail.[redacted]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My previous employer tried very hard to use GitLab and had to switch
>>>>>>> to GitHub because GitLab's performance just wasn't there.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Todd Edwards < <todd@mtn.[redacted]>
>>>>>>> todd@mtn.[redacted]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Might I suggest something like Gogs (https://gogs.io/) instead of
>>>>>>>> Gitlab? In my experience the performance/hardware requirements of Gitlab in
>>>>>>>> comparison is night and day.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sorry, I just needed to get that out.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -- Todd
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Neill Robson < <nlrobson@ncsu.[redacted]>
>>>>>>>> nlrobson@ncsu.[redacted]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> My vote is also still for a GitLab instance, since it leaves
>>>>>>>>> possibilities open for both personal and club-wide projects wherever
>>>>>>>>> programming is necessary (which is, of course, nearly everywhere).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> My apologies for the radio silence on my end; I've been in China
>>>>>>>>> since the beginning of May and haven't had consistent access to email.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hope everybody's summer is going well!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 06/15/2016 08:15 AM, Quentin Young wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi again!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Looks like I made a typo in the last email; we upgraded *char*,
>>>>>>>>> not short, to Xenial.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Still haven't gotten any suggestions about what to use it for
>>>>>>>>> though! Let thy voice be heard!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yours,
>>>>>>>>> Quentin
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 3:04 AM, Quentin Young <
>>>>>>>>> <qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]>qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm happy to announce that myself and our Vice President, Tony
>>>>>>>>>> Iskander,
>>>>>>>>>> successfully upgraded short to Ubuntu 16.04 (Xenial Xerus) on
>>>>>>>>>> Friday.
>>>>>>>>>> Installation went without a hitch, and you can expect some more
>>>>>>>>>> details on our
>>>>>>>>>> website soon.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> As of now there are no user accounts (except for myself) because
>>>>>>>>>> we haven't yet
>>>>>>>>>> decided what to do with this particular piece of hardware.
>>>>>>>>>> Suggestions I have
>>>>>>>>>> heard so far are:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - seti@home
>>>>>>>>>> - folding@home
>>>>>>>>>> - others that I forgot
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I would love to hear suggestions from members as to what we want
>>>>>>>>>> to use this
>>>>>>>>>> server for. Keep in mind it is an old server and its specs are
>>>>>>>>>> not quite as
>>>>>>>>>> beefy as Short:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - 2.8 GHz Intel Xeon, quadcore
>>>>>>>>>> - 3 GB memory (lol)
>>>>>>>>>> - 1 TB HDD
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> My personal vote is for a GitLab instance. I've also been
>>>>>>>>>> thinking about
>>>>>>>>>> whether it might be prudent to simply move all of our hosted
>>>>>>>>>> services onto this
>>>>>>>>>> lower power server (currently those are the website and ZNC) and
>>>>>>>>>> keep short as
>>>>>>>>>> a higher performance server for use by club members. Anyway,
>>>>>>>>>> reply and let me
>>>>>>>>>> know what you think!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Enjoy the rest of your weekend,
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Quentin Young
>>>>>>>>>> President, LUG @ NC State
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Quentin Young
>>>>>>>>> President, LUG @ NC State
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Quentin Young
>>>>> President, LUG @ NC State
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Quentin Young
>>>> President, LUG @ NC State
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Quentin Young
>>> President, LUG @ NC State
>>>
>>
>>


[Attachment of type text/html removed.]

------------------------------

End of [lug] Digest (3 messages)
**********