Index
Subject
: [lug] Digest (3 messages)
From
: lug-owner@lists.ncsu.[redacted]
Date
: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:19:41 -0400
The Lug Digest
Volume 1 : Issue 376 : "text" Format
Messages in this Issue:
201606/8 : Re: Char has been upgraded
Quentin Young <qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]>
201606/9 : Re: Char has been upgraded
Quentin Young <qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]>
201606/10 : Re: Char has been upgraded
Quentin Young <qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 22:01:49 -0400
From: Quentin Young <qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]>
To: lug@lists.ncsu.[redacted]
Subject: Re: Char has been upgraded
Message-ID: <CANhSzx3d=Zp4xKYxL3AMxt+HLj6wa0TX3x6UHzSGZ5vUUgmyLQ@mail.gmail.[redacted]>
NCSU's GitHub Enterprise instance is fully private and requires LDAP
authentication with your Unity credentials. Repositories are not
world-readable. My vote is still with a hosted Git service.
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Neill Robson <nlrobson@ncsu.[redacted]> wrote:
> Ah, I had not thought of that! Well, a hosted git service was the only
> idea I had, unfortunately.
>
> On 06/16/2016 08:31 AM, Antonious Iskander wrote:
>
> since ncsu has GitHub already then it would just be a redundant service to
> have gitlab or gogs.
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Brian Cottingham <
> <spiffytech@gmail.[redacted]>spiffytech@gmail.[redacted]> wrote:
>
>> My previous employer tried very hard to use GitLab and had to switch to
>> GitHub because GitLab's performance just wasn't there.
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Todd Edwards < <todd@mtn.[redacted]>todd@mtn.[redacted]
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Might I suggest something like Gogs (https://gogs.io/) instead of
>>> Gitlab? In my experience the performance/hardware requirements of Gitlab in
>>> comparison is night and day.
>>>
>>> Sorry, I just needed to get that out.
>>>
>>> -- Todd
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Neill Robson < <nlrobson@ncsu.[redacted]>
>>> nlrobson@ncsu.[redacted]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> My vote is also still for a GitLab instance, since it leaves
>>>> possibilities open for both personal and club-wide projects wherever
>>>> programming is necessary (which is, of course, nearly everywhere).
>>>>
>>>> My apologies for the radio silence on my end; I've been in China since
>>>> the beginning of May and haven't had consistent access to email.
>>>>
>>>> Hope everybody's summer is going well!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 06/15/2016 08:15 AM, Quentin Young wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi again!
>>>>
>>>> Looks like I made a typo in the last email; we upgraded *char*, not
>>>> short, to Xenial.
>>>>
>>>> Still haven't gotten any suggestions about what to use it for though!
>>>> Let thy voice be heard!
>>>>
>>>> Yours,
>>>> Quentin
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 3:04 AM, Quentin Young < <qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]>
>>>> qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm happy to announce that myself and our Vice President, Tony
>>>>> Iskander,
>>>>> successfully upgraded short to Ubuntu 16.04 (Xenial Xerus) on Friday.
>>>>> Installation went without a hitch, and you can expect some more
>>>>> details on our
>>>>> website soon.
>>>>>
>>>>> As of now there are no user accounts (except for myself) because we
>>>>> haven't yet
>>>>> decided what to do with this particular piece of hardware. Suggestions
>>>>> I have
>>>>> heard so far are:
>>>>>
>>>>> - seti@home
>>>>> - folding@home
>>>>> - others that I forgot
>>>>>
>>>>> I would love to hear suggestions from members as to what we want to
>>>>> use this
>>>>> server for. Keep in mind it is an old server and its specs are not
>>>>> quite as
>>>>> beefy as Short:
>>>>>
>>>>> - 2.8 GHz Intel Xeon, quadcore
>>>>> - 3 GB memory (lol)
>>>>> - 1 TB HDD
>>>>>
>>>>> My personal vote is for a GitLab instance. I've also been thinking
>>>>> about
>>>>> whether it might be prudent to simply move all of our hosted services
>>>>> onto this
>>>>> lower power server (currently those are the website and ZNC) and keep
>>>>> short as
>>>>> a higher performance server for use by club members. Anyway, reply and
>>>>> let me
>>>>> know what you think!
>>>>>
>>>>> Enjoy the rest of your weekend,
>>>>> --
>>>>> Quentin Young
>>>>> President, LUG @ NC State
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Quentin Young
>>>> President, LUG @ NC State
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
--
Quentin Young
President, LUG @ NC State
[Attachment of type text/html removed.]
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 22:03:38 -0400
From: Quentin Young <qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]>
To: lug@lists.ncsu.[redacted]
Subject: Re: Char has been upgraded
Message-ID: <CANhSzx0TKU492E-jrK3OP0Teuzd+Zx6aeBn7zuTr04zG7PpdTA@mail.gmail.[redacted]>
Additionally, I may be wrong on this front, but I recall reading somewhere
that the University retains many privileges and some form of copyright over
any code hosted there. If anyone has further information on this I'd love
to know more, but that's my understanding.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Quentin Young <qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]> wrote:
> NCSU's GitHub Enterprise instance is fully private and requires LDAP
> authentication with your Unity credentials. Repositories are not
> world-readable. My vote is still with a hosted Git service.
>
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Neill Robson <nlrobson@ncsu.[redacted]> wrote:
>
>> Ah, I had not thought of that! Well, a hosted git service was the only
>> idea I had, unfortunately.
>>
>> On 06/16/2016 08:31 AM, Antonious Iskander wrote:
>>
>> since ncsu has GitHub already then it would just be a redundant service
>> to have gitlab or gogs.
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Brian Cottingham <
>> <spiffytech@gmail.[redacted]>spiffytech@gmail.[redacted]> wrote:
>>
>>> My previous employer tried very hard to use GitLab and had to switch to
>>> GitHub because GitLab's performance just wasn't there.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Todd Edwards < <todd@mtn.[redacted]>
>>> todd@mtn.[redacted]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Might I suggest something like Gogs (https://gogs.io/) instead of
>>>> Gitlab? In my experience the performance/hardware requirements of Gitlab in
>>>> comparison is night and day.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, I just needed to get that out.
>>>>
>>>> -- Todd
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Neill Robson < <nlrobson@ncsu.[redacted]>
>>>> nlrobson@ncsu.[redacted]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> My vote is also still for a GitLab instance, since it leaves
>>>>> possibilities open for both personal and club-wide projects wherever
>>>>> programming is necessary (which is, of course, nearly everywhere).
>>>>>
>>>>> My apologies for the radio silence on my end; I've been in China since
>>>>> the beginning of May and haven't had consistent access to email.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hope everybody's summer is going well!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 06/15/2016 08:15 AM, Quentin Young wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi again!
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks like I made a typo in the last email; we upgraded *char*, not
>>>>> short, to Xenial.
>>>>>
>>>>> Still haven't gotten any suggestions about what to use it for though!
>>>>> Let thy voice be heard!
>>>>>
>>>>> Yours,
>>>>> Quentin
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 3:04 AM, Quentin Young < <qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]>
>>>>> qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm happy to announce that myself and our Vice President, Tony
>>>>>> Iskander,
>>>>>> successfully upgraded short to Ubuntu 16.04 (Xenial Xerus) on Friday.
>>>>>> Installation went without a hitch, and you can expect some more
>>>>>> details on our
>>>>>> website soon.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As of now there are no user accounts (except for myself) because we
>>>>>> haven't yet
>>>>>> decided what to do with this particular piece of hardware.
>>>>>> Suggestions I have
>>>>>> heard so far are:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - seti@home
>>>>>> - folding@home
>>>>>> - others that I forgot
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would love to hear suggestions from members as to what we want to
>>>>>> use this
>>>>>> server for. Keep in mind it is an old server and its specs are not
>>>>>> quite as
>>>>>> beefy as Short:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - 2.8 GHz Intel Xeon, quadcore
>>>>>> - 3 GB memory (lol)
>>>>>> - 1 TB HDD
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My personal vote is for a GitLab instance. I've also been thinking
>>>>>> about
>>>>>> whether it might be prudent to simply move all of our hosted services
>>>>>> onto this
>>>>>> lower power server (currently those are the website and ZNC) and keep
>>>>>> short as
>>>>>> a higher performance server for use by club members. Anyway, reply
>>>>>> and let me
>>>>>> know what you think!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Enjoy the rest of your weekend,
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Quentin Young
>>>>>> President, LUG @ NC State
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Quentin Young
>>>>> President, LUG @ NC State
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Quentin Young
> President, LUG @ NC State
>
--
Quentin Young
President, LUG @ NC State
[Attachment of type text/html removed.]
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 22:49:11 -0400
From: Quentin Young <qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]>
To: lug@lists.ncsu.[redacted]
Subject: Re: Char has been upgraded
Message-ID: <CANhSzx1-PeAPDXS_Y-sWFXFAyJ4h48-2joQnt4_0UK37jnO0nw@mail.gmail.[redacted]>
I am wrong, students retain IP over their code. However the FAQ does indeed
note:
*"NCSU GitHub is specifically designed to not compete with Github.com as
far as public offering. “Public” inside of NCSU GitHub is public to the
institution, not the world. If a given project is truly open source, then
it may be more appropriate to host it at GitHub.com with a personal
account."*
...or on your friendly neighborhood Linux User Group's hosted git service
:-)
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:03 PM, Quentin Young <qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]> wrote:
> Additionally, I may be wrong on this front, but I recall reading somewhere
> that the University retains many privileges and some form of copyright over
> any code hosted there. If anyone has further information on this I'd love
> to know more, but that's my understanding.
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Quentin Young <qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]> wrote:
>
>> NCSU's GitHub Enterprise instance is fully private and requires LDAP
>> authentication with your Unity credentials. Repositories are not
>> world-readable. My vote is still with a hosted Git service.
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Neill Robson <nlrobson@ncsu.[redacted]> wrote:
>>
>>> Ah, I had not thought of that! Well, a hosted git service was the only
>>> idea I had, unfortunately.
>>>
>>> On 06/16/2016 08:31 AM, Antonious Iskander wrote:
>>>
>>> since ncsu has GitHub already then it would just be a redundant service
>>> to have gitlab or gogs.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Brian Cottingham <
>>> <spiffytech@gmail.[redacted]>spiffytech@gmail.[redacted]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> My previous employer tried very hard to use GitLab and had to switch to
>>>> GitHub because GitLab's performance just wasn't there.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Todd Edwards < <todd@mtn.[redacted]>
>>>> todd@mtn.[redacted]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Might I suggest something like Gogs (https://gogs.io/) instead of
>>>>> Gitlab? In my experience the performance/hardware requirements of Gitlab in
>>>>> comparison is night and day.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, I just needed to get that out.
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Todd
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Neill Robson < <nlrobson@ncsu.[redacted]>
>>>>> nlrobson@ncsu.[redacted]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> My vote is also still for a GitLab instance, since it leaves
>>>>>> possibilities open for both personal and club-wide projects wherever
>>>>>> programming is necessary (which is, of course, nearly everywhere).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My apologies for the radio silence on my end; I've been in China
>>>>>> since the beginning of May and haven't had consistent access to email.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hope everybody's summer is going well!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 06/15/2016 08:15 AM, Quentin Young wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi again!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Looks like I made a typo in the last email; we upgraded *char*, not
>>>>>> short, to Xenial.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Still haven't gotten any suggestions about what to use it for though!
>>>>>> Let thy voice be heard!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yours,
>>>>>> Quentin
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 3:04 AM, Quentin Young < <qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]>
>>>>>> qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm happy to announce that myself and our Vice President, Tony
>>>>>>> Iskander,
>>>>>>> successfully upgraded short to Ubuntu 16.04 (Xenial Xerus) on Friday.
>>>>>>> Installation went without a hitch, and you can expect some more
>>>>>>> details on our
>>>>>>> website soon.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As of now there are no user accounts (except for myself) because we
>>>>>>> haven't yet
>>>>>>> decided what to do with this particular piece of hardware.
>>>>>>> Suggestions I have
>>>>>>> heard so far are:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - seti@home
>>>>>>> - folding@home
>>>>>>> - others that I forgot
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would love to hear suggestions from members as to what we want to
>>>>>>> use this
>>>>>>> server for. Keep in mind it is an old server and its specs are not
>>>>>>> quite as
>>>>>>> beefy as Short:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - 2.8 GHz Intel Xeon, quadcore
>>>>>>> - 3 GB memory (lol)
>>>>>>> - 1 TB HDD
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My personal vote is for a GitLab instance. I've also been thinking
>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>> whether it might be prudent to simply move all of our hosted
>>>>>>> services onto this
>>>>>>> lower power server (currently those are the website and ZNC) and
>>>>>>> keep short as
>>>>>>> a higher performance server for use by club members. Anyway, reply
>>>>>>> and let me
>>>>>>> know what you think!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Enjoy the rest of your weekend,
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Quentin Young
>>>>>>> President, LUG @ NC State
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Quentin Young
>>>>>> President, LUG @ NC State
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Quentin Young
>> President, LUG @ NC State
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Quentin Young
> President, LUG @ NC State
>
--
Quentin Young
President, LUG @ NC State
[Attachment of type text/html removed.]
------------------------------
End of [lug] Digest (3 messages)
**********