Index
Subject
: [lug] Digest (5 messages)
From
: lug-owner@lists.ncsu.[redacted]
Date
: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 18:03:54 -0400
The Lug Digest
Volume 1 : Issue 375 : "text" Format
Messages in this Issue:
201606/3 : Re: Char has been upgraded
Neill Robson <nlrobson@ncsu.[redacted]>
201606/4 : Re: Char has been upgraded
Todd Edwards <todd@mtn.[redacted]>
201606/5 : Re: Char has been upgraded
Brian Cottingham <spiffytech@gmail.[redacted]>
201606/6 : Re: Char has been upgraded
Antonious Iskander <amiskand@ncsu.[redacted]>
201606/7 : Re: Char has been upgraded
Neill Robson <nlrobson@ncsu.[redacted]>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 08:25:25 +0800
From: Neill Robson <nlrobson@ncsu.[redacted]>
To: lug@lists.ncsu.[redacted]
Subject: Re: Char has been upgraded
Message-ID: <5760A075.8070908@ncsu.[redacted]>
My vote is also still for a GitLab instance, since it leaves
possibilities open for both personal and club-wide projects wherever
programming is necessary (which is, of course, nearly everywhere).
My apologies for the radio silence on my end; I've been in China since
the beginning of May and haven't had consistent access to email.
Hope everybody's summer is going well!
On 06/15/2016 08:15 AM, Quentin Young wrote:
> Hi again!
>
> Looks like I made a typo in the last email; we upgraded *char*, not
> short, to Xenial.
>
> Still haven't gotten any suggestions about what to use it for though!
> Let thy voice be heard!
>
> Yours,
> Quentin
>
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 3:04 AM, Quentin Young <qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]
> <mailto:qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]>> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm happy to announce that myself and our Vice President, Tony
> Iskander,
> successfully upgraded short to Ubuntu 16.04 (Xenial Xerus) on Friday.
> Installation went without a hitch, and you can expect some more
> details on our
> website soon.
>
> As of now there are no user accounts (except for myself) because
> we haven't yet
> decided what to do with this particular piece of hardware.
> Suggestions I have
> heard so far are:
>
> * seti@home
> * folding@home
> * others that I forgot
>
> I would love to hear suggestions from members as to what we want
> to use this
> server for. Keep in mind it is an old server and its specs are not
> quite as
> beefy as Short:
>
> * 2.8 GHz Intel Xeon, quadcore
> * 3 GB memory (lol)
> * 1 TB HDD
>
> My personal vote is for a GitLab instance. I've also been thinking
> about
> whether it might be prudent to simply move all of our hosted
> services onto this
> lower power server (currently those are the website and ZNC) and
> keep short as
> a higher performance server for use by club members. Anyway, reply
> and let me
> know what you think!
>
> Enjoy the rest of your weekend,
> --
> Quentin Young
> President, LUG @ NC State
>
>
>
>
> --
> Quentin Young
> President, LUG @ NC State
[Attachment of type text/html removed.]
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 10:41:27 -0400
From: Todd Edwards <todd@mtn.[redacted]>
To: lug@lists.ncsu.[redacted]
Subject: Re: Char has been upgraded
Message-ID: <CAHJ3xVuN7M+-Jd1m53SBKS5sgZCrZKim5NpXnTG7w2HMJrMKeQ@mail.gmail.[redacted]>
Might I suggest something like Gogs (https://gogs.io/) instead of Gitlab?
In my experience the performance/hardware requirements of Gitlab in
comparison is night and day.
Sorry, I just needed to get that out.
-- Todd
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Neill Robson <nlrobson@ncsu.[redacted]> wrote:
> My vote is also still for a GitLab instance, since it leaves possibilities
> open for both personal and club-wide projects wherever programming is
> necessary (which is, of course, nearly everywhere).
>
> My apologies for the radio silence on my end; I've been in China since the
> beginning of May and haven't had consistent access to email.
>
> Hope everybody's summer is going well!
>
>
> On 06/15/2016 08:15 AM, Quentin Young wrote:
>
> Hi again!
>
> Looks like I made a typo in the last email; we upgraded *char*, not
> short, to Xenial.
>
> Still haven't gotten any suggestions about what to use it for though! Let
> thy voice be heard!
>
> Yours,
> Quentin
>
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 3:04 AM, Quentin Young <qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm happy to announce that myself and our Vice President, Tony Iskander,
>> successfully upgraded short to Ubuntu 16.04 (Xenial Xerus) on Friday.
>> Installation went without a hitch, and you can expect some more details
>> on our
>> website soon.
>>
>> As of now there are no user accounts (except for myself) because we
>> haven't yet
>> decided what to do with this particular piece of hardware. Suggestions I
>> have
>> heard so far are:
>>
>> - seti@home
>> - folding@home
>> - others that I forgot
>>
>> I would love to hear suggestions from members as to what we want to use
>> this
>> server for. Keep in mind it is an old server and its specs are not quite
>> as
>> beefy as Short:
>>
>> - 2.8 GHz Intel Xeon, quadcore
>> - 3 GB memory (lol)
>> - 1 TB HDD
>>
>> My personal vote is for a GitLab instance. I've also been thinking about
>> whether it might be prudent to simply move all of our hosted services
>> onto this
>> lower power server (currently those are the website and ZNC) and keep
>> short as
>> a higher performance server for use by club members. Anyway, reply and
>> let me
>> know what you think!
>>
>> Enjoy the rest of your weekend,
>> --
>> Quentin Young
>> President, LUG @ NC State
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Quentin Young
> President, LUG @ NC State
>
>
>
[Attachment of type text/html removed.]
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 10:45:28 -0400
From: Brian Cottingham <spiffytech@gmail.[redacted]>
To: NCSU LUG <lug@lists.ncsu.[redacted]>
Subject: Re: Char has been upgraded
Message-ID: <CAJEMKXO3wGf_m9Yc6xgPzGgp5jV9=Wato0GcjEwgZB0_0zxPrg@mail.gmail.[redacted]>
My previous employer tried very hard to use GitLab and had to switch to
GitHub because GitLab's performance just wasn't there.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Todd Edwards <todd@mtn.[redacted]> wrote:
> Might I suggest something like Gogs (https://gogs.io/) instead of Gitlab?
> In my experience the performance/hardware requirements of Gitlab in
> comparison is night and day.
>
> Sorry, I just needed to get that out.
>
> -- Todd
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Neill Robson <nlrobson@ncsu.[redacted]> wrote:
>
>> My vote is also still for a GitLab instance, since it leaves
>> possibilities open for both personal and club-wide projects wherever
>> programming is necessary (which is, of course, nearly everywhere).
>>
>> My apologies for the radio silence on my end; I've been in China since
>> the beginning of May and haven't had consistent access to email.
>>
>> Hope everybody's summer is going well!
>>
>>
>> On 06/15/2016 08:15 AM, Quentin Young wrote:
>>
>> Hi again!
>>
>> Looks like I made a typo in the last email; we upgraded *char*, not
>> short, to Xenial.
>>
>> Still haven't gotten any suggestions about what to use it for though! Let
>> thy voice be heard!
>>
>> Yours,
>> Quentin
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 3:04 AM, Quentin Young <qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm happy to announce that myself and our Vice President, Tony Iskander,
>>> successfully upgraded short to Ubuntu 16.04 (Xenial Xerus) on Friday.
>>> Installation went without a hitch, and you can expect some more details
>>> on our
>>> website soon.
>>>
>>> As of now there are no user accounts (except for myself) because we
>>> haven't yet
>>> decided what to do with this particular piece of hardware. Suggestions I
>>> have
>>> heard so far are:
>>>
>>> - seti@home
>>> - folding@home
>>> - others that I forgot
>>>
>>> I would love to hear suggestions from members as to what we want to use
>>> this
>>> server for. Keep in mind it is an old server and its specs are not quite
>>> as
>>> beefy as Short:
>>>
>>> - 2.8 GHz Intel Xeon, quadcore
>>> - 3 GB memory (lol)
>>> - 1 TB HDD
>>>
>>> My personal vote is for a GitLab instance. I've also been thinking about
>>> whether it might be prudent to simply move all of our hosted services
>>> onto this
>>> lower power server (currently those are the website and ZNC) and keep
>>> short as
>>> a higher performance server for use by club members. Anyway, reply and
>>> let me
>>> know what you think!
>>>
>>> Enjoy the rest of your weekend,
>>> --
>>> Quentin Young
>>> President, LUG @ NC State
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Quentin Young
>> President, LUG @ NC State
>>
>>
>>
>
[Attachment of type text/html removed.]
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 08:31:38 -0400
From: Antonious Iskander <amiskand@ncsu.[redacted]>
To: lug@lists.ncsu.[redacted]
Subject: Re: Char has been upgraded
Message-ID: <CAFAjCZO4oK6Egjdn3rE5EcL0tFUOCMWKfoa=r9mnFxH7Cuh-GA@mail.gmail.[redacted]>
since ncsu has GitHub already then it would just be a redundant service to
have gitlab or gogs.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Brian Cottingham <spiffytech@gmail.[redacted]>
wrote:
> My previous employer tried very hard to use GitLab and had to switch to
> GitHub because GitLab's performance just wasn't there.
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Todd Edwards <todd@mtn.[redacted]> wrote:
>
>> Might I suggest something like Gogs (https://gogs.io/) instead of
>> Gitlab? In my experience the performance/hardware requirements of Gitlab in
>> comparison is night and day.
>>
>> Sorry, I just needed to get that out.
>>
>> -- Todd
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Neill Robson <nlrobson@ncsu.[redacted]> wrote:
>>
>>> My vote is also still for a GitLab instance, since it leaves
>>> possibilities open for both personal and club-wide projects wherever
>>> programming is necessary (which is, of course, nearly everywhere).
>>>
>>> My apologies for the radio silence on my end; I've been in China since
>>> the beginning of May and haven't had consistent access to email.
>>>
>>> Hope everybody's summer is going well!
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/15/2016 08:15 AM, Quentin Young wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi again!
>>>
>>> Looks like I made a typo in the last email; we upgraded *char*, not
>>> short, to Xenial.
>>>
>>> Still haven't gotten any suggestions about what to use it for though!
>>> Let thy voice be heard!
>>>
>>> Yours,
>>> Quentin
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 3:04 AM, Quentin Young <qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I'm happy to announce that myself and our Vice President, Tony Iskander,
>>>> successfully upgraded short to Ubuntu 16.04 (Xenial Xerus) on Friday.
>>>> Installation went without a hitch, and you can expect some more details
>>>> on our
>>>> website soon.
>>>>
>>>> As of now there are no user accounts (except for myself) because we
>>>> haven't yet
>>>> decided what to do with this particular piece of hardware. Suggestions
>>>> I have
>>>> heard so far are:
>>>>
>>>> - seti@home
>>>> - folding@home
>>>> - others that I forgot
>>>>
>>>> I would love to hear suggestions from members as to what we want to use
>>>> this
>>>> server for. Keep in mind it is an old server and its specs are not
>>>> quite as
>>>> beefy as Short:
>>>>
>>>> - 2.8 GHz Intel Xeon, quadcore
>>>> - 3 GB memory (lol)
>>>> - 1 TB HDD
>>>>
>>>> My personal vote is for a GitLab instance. I've also been thinking
>>>> about
>>>> whether it might be prudent to simply move all of our hosted services
>>>> onto this
>>>> lower power server (currently those are the website and ZNC) and keep
>>>> short as
>>>> a higher performance server for use by club members. Anyway, reply and
>>>> let me
>>>> know what you think!
>>>>
>>>> Enjoy the rest of your weekend,
>>>> --
>>>> Quentin Young
>>>> President, LUG @ NC State
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Quentin Young
>>> President, LUG @ NC State
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
[Attachment of type text/html removed.]
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 18:03:04 -0400
From: Neill Robson <nlrobson@ncsu.[redacted]>
To: lug@lists.ncsu.[redacted]
Subject: Re: Char has been upgraded
Message-ID: <57671698.9020804@ncsu.[redacted]>
Ah, I had not thought of that! Well, a hosted git service was the only
idea I had, unfortunately.
On 06/16/2016 08:31 AM, Antonious Iskander wrote:
> since ncsu has GitHub already then it would just be a redundant
> service to have gitlab or gogs.
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Brian Cottingham
> <spiffytech@gmail.[redacted] <mailto:spiffytech@gmail.[redacted]>> wrote:
>
> My previous employer tried very hard to use GitLab and had to
> switch to GitHub because GitLab's performance just wasn't there.
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Todd Edwards <todd@mtn.[redacted]
> <mailto:todd@mtn.[redacted]>> wrote:
>
> Might I suggest something like Gogs (https://gogs.io/) instead
> of Gitlab? In my experience the performance/hardware
> requirements of Gitlab in comparison is night and day.
>
> Sorry, I just needed to get that out.
>
> -- Todd
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Neill Robson
> <nlrobson@ncsu.[redacted] <mailto:nlrobson@ncsu.[redacted]>> wrote:
>
> My vote is also still for a GitLab instance, since it
> leaves possibilities open for both personal and club-wide
> projects wherever programming is necessary (which is, of
> course, nearly everywhere).
>
> My apologies for the radio silence on my end; I've been in
> China since the beginning of May and haven't had
> consistent access to email.
>
> Hope everybody's summer is going well!
>
>
> On 06/15/2016 08:15 AM, Quentin Young wrote:
>> Hi again!
>>
>> Looks like I made a typo in the last email; we upgraded
>> *char*, not short, to Xenial.
>>
>> Still haven't gotten any suggestions about what to use it
>> for though! Let thy voice be heard!
>>
>> Yours,
>> Quentin
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 3:04 AM, Quentin Young
>> <qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted] <mailto:qlyoung@ncsu.[redacted]>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm happy to announce that myself and our Vice
>> President, Tony Iskander,
>> successfully upgraded short to Ubuntu 16.04 (Xenial
>> Xerus) on Friday.
>> Installation went without a hitch, and you can expect
>> some more details on our
>> website soon.
>>
>> As of now there are no user accounts (except for
>> myself) because we haven't yet
>> decided what to do with this particular piece of
>> hardware. Suggestions I have
>> heard so far are:
>>
>> * seti@home
>> * folding@home
>> * others that I forgot
>>
>> I would love to hear suggestions from members as to
>> what we want to use this
>> server for. Keep in mind it is an old server and its
>> specs are not quite as
>> beefy as Short:
>>
>> * 2.8 GHz Intel Xeon, quadcore
>> * 3 GB memory (lol)
>> * 1 TB HDD
>>
>> My personal vote is for a GitLab instance. I've also
>> been thinking about
>> whether it might be prudent to simply move all of our
>> hosted services onto this
>> lower power server (currently those are the website
>> and ZNC) and keep short as
>> a higher performance server for use by club members.
>> Anyway, reply and let me
>> know what you think!
>>
>> Enjoy the rest of your weekend,
>> --
>> Quentin Young
>> President, LUG @ NC State
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Quentin Young
>> President, LUG @ NC State
>
>
>
>
[Attachment of type text/html removed.]
------------------------------
End of [lug] Digest (5 messages)
**********