Index
   
  
  
   
    Subject
   
   : Re: LUG: Sendmail and Squirrelmail
  
  
   
    From
   
   : "Brian Sadler" <brian.sadler@gillgroup.[redacted]>
  
  
   
    Date
   
   : Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:06:27 -0600
  
  
   
    Parent
   
  
  
  Thanks for the quick reply Mark.  Here's another quick question.
  
  
  Can an MX Record be an IP address?
  
  
  Thanks,
  
  
  Brian
  
  
  -----Original Message-----
  
  From: lug-owner@lists.ncsu.[redacted] [mailto:lug-owner@lists.ncsu.[redacted]] On Behalf
  
  Of mark@thefowles.[redacted]
  
  Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 9:01 AM
  
  To: lug@lists.ncsu.[redacted]
  
  Subject: Re: LUG: Sendmail and Squirrelmail
  
  
  
  are you able to do a lookup on your domain from the internet? Just curious
  
  - mail.yourdomain.com .... (this should see the mx record) - The rest of
  
  what you;ve done seems ok (Sending the mail).
  
  
  You need 25, 109/110 open in your firewall (I think) .. along with 80, and
  
  53 (DNS) .....
  
  
  
  - Mark
  
  
  > Hi everyone,
  
  >
  
  > I am somewhat new to linux so please forgive if this is a stupid or
  
  > newbie question.  I am setting up a fedora core 4 linux server to run
  
  > sendmail and squirrel mail for webmail.  I also have dovecot installed
  
  > but I'm not 100% sure that I need it.
  
  >
  
  > If my understanding of the mail server is correct, I need to be
  
  > running sendmail (its the MTA), dovecot (for IMAP/POP3 protocol), and
  
  > squirrelmail
  
  > (webmail) to have this mail server setup properly, is this correct?  I
  
  > want
  
  > my users to use imap to get their mail for security reasons.  We only have
  
  > about 20 users or so will be using this but they do a lot of email. Am I
  
  > correct in feeling that I need all three of these programs to get the mail
  
  > system and webmail running?
  
  >
  
  > If I understand the concepts, sendmail is responsible for handling the
  
  > incoming and outgoing mail.  Dovecot is what allows the users to
  
  > access their mail stored on the server via the pop3 or imap protocols,
  
  > and squirrelmail allows them to access the mail via imap using a web
  
  > interface (for when they are at home or on the road).  All three of
  
  > these are necessary for mail to run properly except squirrelmail
  
  > (although it is needed for the webmail).  Is this correct?
  
  >
  
  > In order to setup this server to accept mail for a domain, I know that
  
  > I have to have the MX record pointed to its ip address.  No problem
  
  > there.
  
  >
  
  > I am able to connect using imap and send mail from inside the network
  
  > but I'm having trouble receiving mail from outside the intranet.  I
  
  > have a small hole poked in our sites firewall to allow smtp and http
  
  > traffic.
  
  >
  
  > I have a couple test accounts setup and can send mail to outside
  
  > addresses and internal address just fine, but receiving mail seems to
  
  > have a problem from outside.  Are the smtp and http protocols ports
  
  > the only ones I need open on the firewall?  I believe that they are
  
  > but want to double check the theory.
  
  >
  
  > If I type in an address of username@216.0.0.[redacted] (ip address is not the
  
  > real address), shouldn't mail come to the server?
  
  >
  
  > Also, any suggestions on an easy to use and fairly secure ldap server
  
  > (for a central address book) would also be appreciated or do we not
  
  > need LDAP for a
  
  > central address book.
  
  >
  
  > Any help would be most greatly appreciated.
  
  >
  
  > Sincerely,
  
  >
  
  > Brian
  
  >
  
  > P.S.  Telling me to RTFM is not helpful.  I've read it.  If thats all
  
  > you can say, please don't reply at all.  Sorry about this but I've had
  
  > several rude replies from the internet on so called helpsites.
  
  > Hopefully this will be different.
  
  >
  
  > --
  
  > This message has been scanned for viruses and
  
  > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
  
  > believed to be clean.
  
  >
  
  >
  
  
  
  
  --
  
  This message has been scanned for viruses and
  
  dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
  
  believed to be clean.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
    Replies
   
   :